• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    299 days ago

    You’re really trying to strawman me and aren’t making good faith arguments here so I’m not going to waste too much time on a response… but take 51 and then subtract 2 from it (for Manchin and Sinema who won’t vote with dems on these issues) - is that 50? Besides that dems also don’t control the house.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -329 days ago

      Also, 50 was enough for Kamala to cast the tiebreaking vote to expand domestic fracking…

      Why is 50 enough to do what republicans want. But not enough to do what Dems want?

      Are you going to double down and say that’s what Dem voters want? More fracking?

      50 is enough for republicans to get what they want, just not enough for Dem voters to get what they want

      but take 51 and then subtract 2 from it (for Manchin and Sinema who won’t vote with dems on these issues) - is that 50?

      If you just forget that Biden and the party said 50 was enough when we knew two of them was Manchin and Sinema.

      So again:

      Are you saying they were lying, or that you know more about it than Biden and his admin and they were just ignorant?

      And for this:

      Besides that dems also don’t control the house.

      We’re just ignoring the two years we also had the House?

      Is any of this getting thru to you? Because honestly you’re not the only one here about to write off any chances of you understanding this…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        149 days ago

        Math isn’t your strong point is it? 51 - 2 != 50. Go pick up your crayons and practice your numbers and stop with your bullshit spewing you always seem to be doing.

        The Democrats have not controlled both the house and senate for more than a few months in the last decade+. When they did, they got the ACA passed. Manchin and Sinema are DINOs at best.