• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      27
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      well “arrested” doesn’t actually mean it’s illegal, it just means the cops thought they likely did something illegal

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 days ago

      Reminds me of that YouTuber that convinced his pregnant partner to shoot him with a desert eagle while holding an encyclopedia in front of his chest. He died, she was sentenced to 180 days for manslaughter

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 days ago

        Did the bullet penetrate the book and still have enough momentum to penetrate his sternum, or did he die from the force of impact? That’s the thing about bulletproof vests too. Sure, they may stop the bullet, but it’s still going to fuck you up.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          49 days ago

          It went through the book. I don’t know if a bullet proof vest can stop a 50 cal fired from a foot away either tbh, but definitely like you’re saying it won’t prevent injury

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 days ago

      Especially in the US?? It’s not like they won’t be paying for their own healthcare lmao

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      49 days ago

      I would imagine the blanket statute to refer to is something like reckless endangerment, or perhaps more likely would be the firearms themselves being unlicensed.

      Additionally, if I shot at someone who was wearing a bulletproof vest, it still would be attempted murder. If they asked me to shoot at them, it still would continue to be attempted murder (“no judge, they asked me to shoot them and I missed”).

      I mean, even if someone explicitly asked for you to kill them, in writing, notarized, and all that legal jazz, then you’re getting into the realm of assisted suicide and that lovely grey area of morality. Though I believe it’s still illegal throughout the US.

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 days ago

        What do I care if a couple of idiots want to shoot each other while wearing bulletproof vests? The government would almost certainly allow it if they applied for a bunch of special permits and shit. This basically comes down to your philosophy, does the government grant rights, or do you inherently have rights, and only things that harm other people without their consent should be illegal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          What if one person was inebriated? Developmentally challenged? homicidal? Suicidal? A really bad shot?

          • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 days ago

            I mean, both of these guys are probably developmentally challenged or inebriated. They were shooting each other while wearing bulletproof vests.