• @conciselyverbose
    link
    English
    35 days ago

    If they were free on demand for people who asked with their purchase:

    None of the people who need them would get them.

    Most of the ones that did get handed out would still be to people who never used them.

      • @conciselyverbose
        link
        English
        13 days ago

        Because there’s very little overlap between people who need them and people who know that it’s an option.

        The people claiming them would primarily be people like me who do know how it works, know that I probably won’t use it, but am going to take it anyways, because it’s free and because it is within the realm of possibility that I need another cable as a temporary replacement until I get another one.

        • nudny ekscentryk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          03 days ago

          Simple solution: if a device you sell comes without charging cable, it has to be written in large letters on the box that you have the right to claim one for free (like cigarette health warning) and the seller has to inform the customer before checkout

          • @conciselyverbose
            link
            English
            13 days ago

            Then everyone will claim one and you’ll increase waste.

            The whole reason they’re removing the cable is because of pressure from governments not to waste materials including it.

            • nudny ekscentryk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              03 days ago

              xD no? Why would everyone claim one? I for example would be fucking glad not to receive e-junk with all my purchases

              • @conciselyverbose
                link
                English
                13 days ago

                Because it’s free. I guarantee you 90% of people will take free shit if offered free shit.

                Including it for free completely undermines the whole reason for removing the cable.