@0x4E4F to [email protected]English • 5 days agoOh the humanity!imagemessage-square33arrow-up1706arrow-down110
arrow-up1696arrow-down1imageOh the humanity!@0x4E4F to [email protected]English • 5 days agomessage-square33
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish7•5 days agoOr “would of”, “could of”, “should of”. Enunciate your words. “have” and “of” sound different.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•5 days agoExcellent point, but “would’ve”, “could’ve”, and “should’ve” sound like “would of”, “could of”, and “should of”. So the problem doesn’t lie solely in enounciation.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•4 days agoIf you think “of” and “have” (or it’s contraction) sound alike, you’re part of the problem. “Of” has a softer finish more like “ovf” than “ov”. The transition from ‘o’ to ‘f’ starts hard with a ‘v’ but finishes with a soft ‘f’.
Or “would of”, “could of”, “should of”. Enunciate your words. “have” and “of” sound different.
Excellent point, but “would’ve”, “could’ve”, and “should’ve” sound like “would of”, “could of”, and “should of”.
So the problem doesn’t lie solely in enounciation.
If you think “of” and “have” (or it’s contraction) sound alike, you’re part of the problem. “Of” has a softer finish more like “ovf” than “ov”. The transition from ‘o’ to ‘f’ starts hard with a ‘v’ but finishes with a soft ‘f’.