Centurion to Funny: Home of the [email protected] • edit-221 hours agoIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down131
arrow-up1340arrow-down1imageIt could have been so easy lemmy.worldCenturion to Funny: Home of the [email protected] • edit-221 hours agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish88•18 hours agoThere’s 3 variables and 1 equation. This is unsolvable.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink27•17 hours agoSince we’re just making shit up anyway Assume k=0 and n is the last natural number. Solved.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•edit-216 hours agoLooks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0. B
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•14 hours agoif n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair. (this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
There’s 3 variables and 1 equation. This is unsolvable.
Since we’re just making shit up anyway
Assume k=0 and n is the last natural number. Solved.
You can reform the term until it reads x =
arcsin(nk-1) ?
Looks correct. However it’s only valid for n ≠ 0.
B
if n = 0 then k = ∞ and just about any value of x works in this case. however x = arcsin(nk -1) still doesn’t work since 0 * ∞ is not defined. so i think the B grade is fair.
(this is all assuming we’re working on the riemann sphere)
deleted by creator