• GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter”

    Then that would also be an oxymoron.

    Local is the opposite of remote. This is a remote server. Remote servers are not local. This is not a matter of interpretation.

    • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It is, actually. It is local to them, it is remote to you. They are differentiating from a remote server in someone else’s datacenter. It is not that confusing.

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This is a FAQ for end users, about a feature in software running on end users’ computers.

        It is absolutely doublespeak to call it “local”. Are we supposed to invent an entirely new term now to distinguish between remote and local? Please do not accept this usage. It will make meaningful communication much harder.

        Edit: I mean seriously, by this token OpenAI, Google, Facebook, etc. could call their servers “locally hosted”. It is an utterly meaningless term if you accept this usage.