• @n3m37h
    link
    66 hours ago

    I sent in a support ticket asking them to save Firefox and stop all this AI bullshit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    37 hours ago

    “Yeah sorry boss, i didn’t actually read the email, instead i had an AI summarize it for me and it got a key detail wrong. Anyway what’s a couple thousand dollars in lost sales right”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    2414 hours ago

    https://orbitbymozilla.com/terms

    4. Content

    A. Content You Share

    By using the Services, you represent that you will only share material (including Inputs) that you own and/or have the legal right to share and sublicense to others, including without limitation, content and data contained in any web-page shared through the Services to generate Outputs. When you submit your own content through the Services, you continue to own the rights to that content. You grant Mozilla a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, sub-license, prepare derivative works from, distribute, perform, and display the Inputs for the purpose of operating the Services.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 hours ago

      Thanks for the link to the privacy policy. You notice, at the bottom, it has links to both “About Mozilla” and “About FakeSpot”?

      When you run the Orbit extension, it connects to two domains with every request:

      1. orbitbymozilla.com
      2. prod.orbit-ml-front-api.fakespot.prod.webservices.mozgcp.net

      There’s FakeSpot again.

      And FakeSpot has a terrible privacy policy that allows sale of private data directly to advertisers.

  • Awoo [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    AI you can trust

    Lost me there

    Easily summarize emails

    Haha “Give us access to all your emails for data and corporate espionage we pwomise nothing bad will be done with it!”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8121 hours ago

    Orbit currently uses a version of Mistral LLM (Mistral 7B) that is locally hosted on Mozilla’s Google Cloud Platform instance.

    Hmm.

    >locally hosted

    >Google Cloud

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

    • NaN
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      It’s a thing.

      Remember how the cloud is someone else’s server? Now you can buy it (or lease) and bring it home, and it becomes only sorta someone else’s.

      Amazon and Azure offer their own on-prem products.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 hours ago

        “Locally hosted” means it’s running on the local host. In this case, that would mean on the same computer running Firefox.

        Calling something that is only accessible over the internet “locally hosted” is outrageous doublespeak.

            • NaN
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter” would you be confused why they didn’t move a rack into your house?

              My question is why are you projecting your limited interpretation as a global truth?

              • Mr. Satan
                link
                fedilink
                47 hours ago

                In IT context local is a well establised term. It’s either hosted locally, i. e. on machine running the browser or not. A datacenter or cloud are remote machines also by the same well established definition.

                • NaN
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 hours ago

                  Ok, now do your own datacenter vs cloud.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                28 hours ago

                The language is confusing, and Mozilla should fix it themselves.

                The important takeaway is: data is sent over an IP address controlled by Google, to a remote server, running Google software. No processing is taking place on someone’s local computer.

                • NaN
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  17 hours ago

                  IP address can belong to Mozilla, but the rest is correct.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                28 hours ago

                If they had said “locally hosted in our datacenter”

                Then that would also be an oxymoron.

                Local is the opposite of remote. This is a remote server. Remote servers are not local. This is not a matter of interpretation.

                • NaN
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  It is, actually. It is local to them, it is remote to you. They are differentiating from a remote server in someone else’s datacenter. It is not that confusing.

      • smpl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        115 hours ago

        lol, I think we’re giving too little credit to the marketing people in tech. I want to read their blogs!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Sounds like they’re running their own LLM instance on googles cloud infrastructure vs using something like OpenAI via API.

      As web dev parlance it makes sense but for marketing it is definitely confusing and they should do better.

  • themeatbridge
    link
    fedilink
    3521 hours ago

    I don’t want that. I want full control and absolute privacy. I do not want your AI reading my emails. Look at that summary, it’s as long as the whole email, and you’re not going to be able to trust that it picked up on the most important part of the email. This is not efficiency, this is novelty.

      • themeatbridge
        link
        fedilink
        111 hours ago

        I won’t. But my concern is that Mozilla is heading in the wrong direction lately, and I have used Firefox for a very long time.

        • Carighan Maconar
          link
          fedilink
          210 hours ago

          We always told them we want things to be optional, and now this is an extension so I dunno. Seems they’re listening?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 hours ago

        So do you actually draw the line at Mozilla never building stuff like this into their browser, or is that a line you would be willing to cross too?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        16 hours ago

        I won’t trust the AI Mozilla uses until they show us the source data. Not the source code that consumes a massive binary blob; the stuff that generated the binary blob they are using.

  • @RmDebArc_5
    link
    English
    518 hours ago

    I find it kind of suspicious that the extension (the fake spot one to) are proprietary.