• Dave2@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      95
      ·
      2 months ago

      Causes instant death but also addiction? They resurrect me and I immediately go for another can of air duster.

      • Scubus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 months ago

        High so addictive not even death results in ingervention

      • Zoot@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Totally guessing but im sure its similar to people saying “Try coke once and you could die!”. Technically true, if your coke is laced with Fent. Maybe get too high of a concentration in your air duster and you simply die?

        • Obi@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Guessing some people suffocate, they get too high, keep huffing and forget to breathe.

    • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is it maybe an US-exclusive thing? Due to less stricter regulations maybe? I’m from Europe and no compressed air was 18+ or had warning signs like “causes instant death”

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        2 months ago

        Probably because you can buy beer at 16, so no one is trying to get high on office supplies.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m in the US and haven’t bought compressed air recently, but I definitely didn’t need to present ID the last time I did.

        This article says 38 states have age restrictions, but after a brief search, I couldn’t find any evidence for this in my state (Utah). It’s illegal to use it to get high and to sell it to someone with the understanding that they’ll use it to get high. But now I’m curious, I’ll have to ask the next time I’m at a store that sells it.

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      A DuPont study tried HFC-152a and HFC-134a on rats, dogs, and humans for time periods of up to three months with a followup examination 2 years with no adverse effects. LINK

      I’m sure this has nothing to do with the USA’S proposed ban DFE last month despite it functioning as a zero-potential for ozone-depletions alternative to CFCs.

      That red line you drew could just be explained by market availability of the new Aerosol that convienently excludes the CFC equivalents which existed before and were banned.