• Ashyr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t really understand what this means. Can you explain the implications?

        • Vash63@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes, and ChromeOS is built from Gentoo. That doesn’t mean much, the end user experience is worlds different.

        • Juniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes it is, so theoretically people can just install Arch with KDE and Steam and get a similar setup. However, there is something to be said about a supported OS versus Arch Linux’s community support which tends to have little patience for people who aren’t well informed about the workings of their OS.

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            So, go with garuda or endeavouros, they have great installers and the community is pretty supportive.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      For the implications, I believe it would create a first class commercial level competition for Windows. It would open the door for a vendor trusted platform that implemented all the anti-cheat technologies. Paving the way to lift the virtual Linux ban on first day AAA games compatibility.

      • SatouKazuma@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        This is what I was getting at. Sure, most games can be run with Proton fine and well, but if anti-cheat is code for “run Windows or else”, a lot of games are just unplayable, forcing gamers to at least dual boot with Windows.