• Sentient Loom
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    I like democracy, but I don’t like our short-sighted (4-8 year) election-campaign-based governing. But between our public and private sectors I know we can meet this challenge and make this happen.

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I disagree on the private sector aspect of this, but I agree on the democracy part. Although, I don’t really view America as true democracy at this moment in history, but that’s besides the point here.

      Fusion technology is at a point in its life cycle where it needs to be a public sector project. There is no path to profitability in the near-term, that would justify private sector involvement, except as a means to extract profit from the very expensive research process of even making this technology feasible.

      Not that I’m against the private sector within the nuclear power industry. I’m very excited to see what they can do with SMR technology. I’m just extremely skeptical of most private-public partnerships, especially in cases like this.

      • Sentient Loom
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would greatly prefer public sector development. I’m just being fatalistic about how our oligarchy conducts itself.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          One way they conduct themselves is by using the politicians they’ve purchased to advocate for forming public-private partnerships, in areas where they shouldn’t exist, which they can then legally siphon off the resources from.