Gotta get creative with your layoffs when you already did massive layoffs but still need to please wall street.

  • sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No, they’re using this as an excuse to cull the workforce.

    In most orgs, this would merely result in losing access to the benefit.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      It can be both, since the vouchers have existed for years and are only now getting scrutiny.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        And with a normal org, they’d simply revoke the benefit and maybe take a penalty from the employee’s future paychecks. Firing someone over such a small benefit is ridiculous and only makes sense if they’re actively looking for ways to cut headcount w/o paying severance or unemployment.