• FlorianSimon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    And it doesn’t work, either. When they tell you we need half the population, they don’t tell you how to reach that objective, when the objective is considered to be achieved.

    They might recognize that some people will have to suffer, but they don’t tell you who will suffer and how.

    Malthusianism is yet another unclear ideology that offers vague promises but assured hardships from dilettantes that are spared enough to not feel the full weight of capitalism.

    Nothing that stands rigorous scrutiny.

    • Rob Bos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      That talking point died decades ago. We have a clear path to reducing our population. Well-off people with access to contraceptives don’t have high birth rates. We can roll back the human birth rate to sub-replacement levels and over time, reduce it.

      There will be a problem with increasing population in 2250 or so, but we can cross that bridge when we come to it.

      The moral thing to do is to ensure that all humans have access to clean water and food, contraceptives, and comfortable lives. The population will naturally go down and we can stabilize it over time.