• pandapoo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    This is not me defending any telecom, but locking subsidized phones during the contract period, is one of the only reasonably legitimate use cases for carrier locking.

    And the reason is simple, fraud. Carrier locked phones that have been reported for fraud/nonpayment, can’t be used off network. It doesn’t help recover the cost for the carrier, but it does deter that type of fraud.

    Whereas unlocked phones can just be taken to another network, which means they’re resale value is worth the effort to steal in the first place.

    Now, all that is true, but that doesn’t mean I’m in favor of it, or that telecoms have ever made unlocking fully paid phones easy, they haven’t, so fuck them.

    And before anyone points it out, yes, I’m aware locked phones still have have value for fraud, but that fraud typically has a higher threshold for entry, as it involves having the contacts who can leverage overseas black markets.

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Not even unlocked phones can be used on another (us) carrier if reported stolen, all IMEIs associated with the device are blacklisted across all legal carriers in the country.

      • pandapoo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        No, they are not. Blacklists are per carrier, at least when dealing with American primary carriers, and not MVNOs.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          No, it’s nationwide, all carriers and mvnos are signed on to the US Block Status since IMEI became standard. It’s a separate list from the global GSMA and not all carriers in the US report to the GSMA like they should,but if a device is reported lost or stolen in the US it cannot be activated by a US carrier until resolved.

          • pandapoo
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Except I have used unlocked IMEI blacklisted devices on different carriers, so if one exists in theory, it doesn’t appear to be there in practice.

            • basmati@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              Depending on what state you’re in, you admitted to fraud or possession of stolen goods, so maybe don’t admit that. That aside yeah some carriers can fail to submit to the US Block Status but generally those instances are rare given the activating carrier can be legally liable.

              • pandapoo
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 month ago

                I’m not admitting to any crime. There are other ways to come into possession of blacklisted IMEI devices, and other ways for them to become blacklisted that don’t involve either of those scenarios.

                Why don’t you go pull up all those FCC fines leveied on carriers for activating blacklisted phones.