• sugar_in_your_tea
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    As a US citizen, I care less about where the software comes from, but who hosts that software, so I tend to use FOSS products and services, preferring to self-host where it’s not too annoying.

    I don’t think anyone should shun citizens from any country, but we should be wary of trusting citizens from countries where the government has a larger influence. So we should be hesitant to trust people from Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran (and a bunch of others, I’m just listing the official enemies of the US), especially if they still live in those countries. That doesn’t mean we should shun people from those countries (I have an awesome coworker from Iran), just that we should hesitate to put them into influential positions. I have no problem collaborating with people from any of those countries, I just think we should be a little extra careful when there’s a stronger incentive for their government to get involved (and manipulating Linux is attractive for pretty much every government, esp. my own).

    • Rolling Resistance@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I have no problem collaborating with people from any of those countries we should hesitate to put them into influential positions

      “I’m an American, and therefore I’m better”

      where the government has a larger influence

      We’re literally talking about Linux Foundation making these changes to comply with requirements of your government.

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        We’re literally talking about Linux Foundation making these changes to comply with requirements of your government.

        In leadership, not code. That’s a pretty big difference.

        I also think we shouldn’t have people from the NSA, CIA, or FBI as maintainers either, because they have clear conflicts of interest. That said, I think it’s a lot less likely for the US government to extort a maintainer to let bad code through than the Russian government. It’s much more likely for the US government to try to hide bad code in the normal review process, and I’m sure that happens w/ Russian spy agencies as well, but allowing someone in a region that has demonstrated that they’re willing to strong-arm people into doing things that benefits the state (i.e. through threats or even outright force) to hold a maintainer position in a very influential piece of software isn’t a great idea, especially when their government is choosing to be an international pariah.

        I have zero problem with Russians contributing code to the kernel, I just think it’s wise to remove Russian citizens from leadership positions to limit the impact of Russian interference in Linux development.