• Corkyskog
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    This doesn’t benefit low income, low income can’t afford to own property.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That’s not inherently true in rural states where the property value math is a lot different. In remote areas, land can only be a few thousand dollars of purchase value, or be passed by family, thus still frequently be inhabited by the dirt poor who have few employment opportunities in said rural areas. I should know, I’m smack dab in the middle of one of said areas.

      • drone509@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Property taxes, like basically every other cost to a rental property, just gets passed down to renters as well. It’s not like landlords let taxes affect their profit margins.

        • greyfox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          North Dakota like many states has a renters refund for those with lower incomes which is designed to at least partially offset that. Limits look to be a bit low but every little bit helps.

      • Corkyskog
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        How ownership in North Dakota is actually smaller than the national average.