The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

  • merde alorsOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    do you really expect people in rural areas to ditch cars?

    will they go back to carts and horses?

    • 佐藤カズマ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Honestly? Buses would be a good short-term solution that can be implemented immediately with the right political will, and enough force.

    • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The US used to have a comprehensive rail network. Every single town had a train station. We already had the solution to this problem.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I live in a rail hub in the us. The city is nicknamed after it and train tracks literally run through the city center.

        It would take me 6 hours to walk there.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 minutes ago

          Please tell me you’re exaggerating. I live in a small city and it only takes me maybe an hour to walk across town. If it’s taking you 6 hours, it’s not rural.

        • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          If it takes 6 hours to walk across your city it’s not rural. Your city needs comprehensive public transportation.

      • merde alorsOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        and what do you use to get to the train station?

        how do you carry goods to that station? Does your train have a stop in every farm?

        • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Wow you’re right there is a use case for a vehicle therefore it’s literally impossible to have public transit in rural areas, despite the fact that it already existed /s

          • merde alorsOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            it’s not like i don’t hate cars, i do. But i really can’t see how you’re going to convince “rurals” with that argument

            good luck to you

            • AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              29 minutes ago

              We aren’t discussing tactics for convincing people of anything. We’re discussing facts. And the fact is there’s no reason public transit can’t work in rural areas as you stated.