• threelonmusketeersOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Perhaps Ryan had an off day? Are the typos still there? I didn’t notice any on my most recent read…

    • CandleTiger@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Headline says, “Flight 6 already tested” which is misleading until you read in the article it means static test.

      only two flights, Flight 1 and Flight 4, have had engine outs on ascent. In fact, during all phases of flight for Flight 4, not a single Raptor shut down prematurely.

      Contradiction, I think they mean flight 5 had no engine outs

      I stopped reading here

      • threelonmusketeersOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Headline says, “Flight 6 already tested” which is misleading until you read in the article it means static test.

        Eh, I think the distinction between test and launch is pretty clear, especially given that the article thumbnail is a photo of said statice fire.

        Contradiction, I think they mean flight 5 had no engine outs

        Oh, good catch, I missed that detail.