• wildbus8979
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Iran got rid of the Shah and got the current freedom loving regime.

    Why, and what came before. 🤔

          • wildbus8979
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Yes, it is. History and medfling does in fact matter in explaining current world events.

            • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              13 days ago

              He is not explaining current world events, he is making one simple statement. The why has no relevance to the truth of that one statement (as far as I can tell). It seems to me you don’t like the statement, so you try to bring in irrelevant points instead of accepting it. This is the kind of irrational thinking that makes people vote for Trump. I am not saying this to insult you, all humans are prone to this kind of thinking. I say it so you can strive to improve.

              Of course, if I am mistaken, then just ignore this.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      13 days ago

      Blaming the US for the excesses of the Iranians is like excusing Charles Manson because he was abused as a child.

      • wildbus8979
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Are you intetionally this ignorant or did the school system fail you?

        Mohammad Mosaddegh (Persian: محمد مصدق, IPA: [mohæmˈmæd(-e) mosædˈdeɢ] ⓘ; 16 June 1882 – 5 March 1967) was an Iranian politician, author, and lawyer who served as the 30th Prime Minister of Iran from 1951 to 1953, elected by the 16th Majlis. He was a member of the Iranian parliament from 1923, and served through a contentious 1952 election into the 17th Iranian Majlis, until his government was overthrown in the 1953 Iran coup aided by the intelligence agencies of the United Kingdom (MI6) and the United States (CIA), led by Kermit Roosevelt Jr.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohammad_Mosaddegh

        In his place, they installed the brutal regime of the Shah. Obviously when you have external influence hindering progress like that the backlash is often strong men and autocracies as are more resistant to such meddling.

        If you want we can continue with how the US government went on to help and fun the Iraq/Iran war following the, unfortunately theocratic, revolution.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          So, you’re saying that because the Shah was terrible in 1979 it’s okay for the current people to be terrible now?

          Right now Vietnam is a very popular tourist destination for Americans. I know people who have been there several times and want to go back.

          • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            Literally two comments ago you were saying this:

            Most of the time when you destroy the system you get a much worse system.

            Was the Shah good or bad? Is it important that what came before the Shah was a popular democratic system that the US destroyed? Is that destruction justified if it becomes a great vacationing spot for Americans?

            You’re all over the place bud.

              • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                No lol, we do not agree.

                There are numerous examples of revolutionary change bringing better, more equitable systems of governance.

                The only pattern I see is that the ones where the US is involved end up turning to shit.

                • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  lol!

                  And of course there’s no chance that the US power structure would be involved if the US had a systemic break down.

                  Blackwater/Academi and the CIA probably already have detailed plans in place. They’ll do what ex-KGB agent Putin did in Russia; let the people throw out the old leadership, then swoop in and buy up the resources for pennies on the dollar.

                  Thanks for helping me prove my point.

                  • archomrade [he/him]@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 days ago

                    Lmao, the CIA fomenting violent revolution in their own country in order to install a pro-western dictator/monarch would be very on-brand, I will grant you that

          • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            “Yeah, well, not enough of you people chose to die horrible, painful deaths at the hands of the brutal blood soaked dictator our country put into power. Therefore, it’s your fault too.”

      • aesthelete@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Strangely enough I suspect a significant amount of Americans would excuse Charles Manson. There’s a giant movement right now to get the Menéndez brothers out of prison because they were abused. Charles Manson would also be helped by the fact that he was a racist white dude trying to ignite a race war.