🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to Greentext · 2 months agoAnon tries to manipulate Tinderimagemessage-square83fedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down152
arrow-up1464arrow-down1imageAnon tries to manipulate Tinder🍹Early to RISA 🧉M to Greentext · 2 months agomessage-square83fedilink
minus-squareSaledovillinkfedilinkarrow-up51arrow-down2·2 months ago How is that “dehumanizing” when human is literally in the explanation. Had it been “female apeoid” I’d have agreed, but humanoid… So “moid” for male humanoid is “dehumanizing” too? “A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
minus-squareatro_city@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up34·2 months agoI stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
minus-squareclickyello@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down1·2 months agograceful. props to you. more people should be like this.
“A humanoid is a non-human entity with human form or characteristics.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanoid
A humanoid is by definition not human, hence calling a human a humanoid is dehumanizing.
I stand corrected. Thank you for the explanation. 👍
graceful. props to you.
more people should be like this.