• imaqtpieA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The urbanism movement exists to help remedy some of the downsides of urban living. One of which is social alienation and isolation as a result of the scale and diversity of cities.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      No, it exists to fix the problems caused by car-dependent suburbia. Inner cities can have problems too, but a lot of those are created by cities wanting to support suburban commuters rather than the local community.

      • imaqtpieA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Suburbia came into being as a result of urban dysfunction. Cities have existed and had problems since long before cars were invented. People nowadays really love to blame everything on cars lmao, if only it were that simple

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          Cities were literally demolished to run highways through them, cutting right through vibrant communities to do so. Auto companies lobbied governments and ran public relations campaigns to change the law and societal mores to make car-centric infrastructure and norms the only way things are done. Ripping up public transport, inventing the concept of “jaywalking” (itself just a form of car-centric victim blaming), and banning the building of more people-friendly communities through strict Euclidean zoning.

          • imaqtpieA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 minutes ago

            Did you forget to respond to my point? Are you suggesting that cities were happy, egalitarian communes prior to the invention of the automobile?

            Highways were constructed because it provided an economic advantage to do so. A city without car infrastructure is not economically viable. With more advanced transportation and communication technology, we will eventually supercede the automobile, but to delude yourself into thinking that it was an arbitrary development is silly. There are many negative externalities caused by automobiles, just as there are many negative externalities caused by electricity. That doesn’t negate the advantages.

            But regardless, the social dynamics of cities predate such problems; even if we reverted to a pre-car culture cities would still be lonely, violent places for some. They would still be the engines of inequality and hierarchy, because they are the hubs of the economic system.