Senators Say TSA's Facial Recognition Program Is Out of Control, Here's How to Opt Out
gizmodo.com
You can opt out of facial recognition at airports, for now, but the TSA has indicated it wants to make the invasive technology a requirement.

A bipartisan group of 12 senators has urged the Transportation Security Administration’s inspector general to investigate the agency’s use of facial recognition, saying it poses a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties.

“This technology will soon be in use at hundreds of major and mid-size airports without an independent evaluation of the technology’s precision or an audit of whether there are sufficient safeguards in place to protect passenger privacy,” the senators wrote.

“While the TSA claims facial recognition is optional, it is confusing and intimidating to opt out of TSA’s facial recognition scans, and our offices have received numerous anecdotal reports of Transportation Security Officers (TSOs) becoming belligerent when a traveler askes to opt out, or simply being unaware of that right,” the senators wrote. They added that in some airports the signage instructing flyers to step in front of a camera is prominently displayed while signs advising passengers of their right to opt out of face scan is “strategically placed in inconspicuous locations.”

To opt out of a face scan at an airport, a traveler need only say that they decline facial recognition. They can then proceed normally through security by presenting an identification document, such as a driver’s license or passport.

  • sugar_in_your_teaEnglish
    34·
    20 hours ago

    Cool, can we end the TSA already? I’d much rather go back to how things were pre-9/11, with a few upgrades here and there.

    • GenXLiberal@lemmy.worldEnglish
      2·
      4 hours ago

      Totally agree, the TSA is more security theater than anything else. Time and again it has been demonstrated that they can be circumvented (sneaking guns or weapons past checkpoints.)

      As the above said reinforce cockpit doors and also repurpose the TSA positions into Air Marshalls, which would help avert any in-flight problems more than on the ground checks. Make it a requirement for airlines to help subsidize the cost (oh gosh! Not regulation!)

      Y’all may not remember pre-9/11 flights and (very) likely don’t recall airline regulations, where prices were fixed and airlines had to compete via other means (better food, perks, etc.) Heck, I barely remember airline regulation days and have to rely on my retired flight attendant aunt.

      Not perfect but better than the creeping surveillance state effort going on.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.ggEnglish
      11·
      8 hours ago

      Yeah I’m with you. Just reinforcing the cockpit doors is enough to take care of the majority of the problem.

      They can bomb a plane but they can also bomb a bus or a subway.

      As someone that was 6 when 9-11 happened, I think this country majorly overreacted and made the state itself one step closer to an authoritarian nightmare.