Seriously i have zero idea what is going on with bluesky. I never used it. Why are people saying it’s centralised? I also heard that a lot of people are joining it.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    The problem I see with BlueSky is, what’s the difference between Bluesky and Twitter?

    Did any learning take place? “Okay, clean sheet design, let’s do it again but better this time” what did they do to keep Bluesky from going the exact same direction Twitter did?

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      It doesn’t promote and endorse literal Nazis. Why y’all pretending like this isn’t a big difference?

      • Captain Aggravated
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yet.

        It’s a commercial platform, it’s going to enshittify because that’s what commercial platforms do.

          • Captain Aggravated
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            “Less nazi than Twitter for the next few months” isn’t good enough for me to adopt it. I’m not going to board a doomed ship.

            Let me be perfectly clear here: Fuck Elon Musk right in the aorta. I am NOT endorsing Twitter here. What I’m mostly doing is endorsing abandoning both microblogging and commercial for-profit social media as concepts.

            Bluesky is gonna get worse. They’re in attract mode right now just like any tech startup; they’re burning venture capital money operating at a loss in too good to be true mode to gather users and when they hit a certain adoption rate or simultaneous active user base all the shit Twitter and Threads do is gonna get turned on.

            “It’s got moderation.” It’s got thought police in potentia. Either they’re going to start using their moderation systems as a political cudgel or they’re going to start letting scammers and shit through because they profit from the traffic whatever that traffic is. You won’t be able to say the word “poop” but commercials for anorexia pills will make it through to teenagers. Can you name a commercial platform that didn’t eventually do one or both of those? The only one I can think of that didn’t just die young was MySpace, which continued to exist into its irrelevancy.

            I foresee a cycle of instability that goes something like “New platform just dropped, it’s like Facebook but it isn’t Facebook. It’s like Facebook used to be before algorithms fucked it up.” Early adopters join it, there’s a period where you still have to have Facebook because three of your friends whose ability to understand things doesn’t work won’t make the switch, eventually people leave those friends, everyone is standardized on the new thing, new thing does exactly what Facebook did, it fucks the world up again, “New platform just dropped, it’s like Screechbox but isn’t Screechbox, it’s like Screechbox before algorithms fucked it up.”

            I’m kicking that in the head right now.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              55 minutes ago

              You people are fucking insane. You act like what the Muskrat is doing is normal and inevitable. No, a billionaire owner of a website losing his mind acting like an infant and going online publicly promoting and endorsing Nazis it’s not the norm. It’s not the inevitable Next Step.

              • Captain Aggravated
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                39 minutes ago

                How many ethnic cleansings has Facebook been instrumental in? I can think of at least one in Myanmar.

                Large commercial platforms being absolutely evil is NOT unique to Twitter. Again I challenge you to name me a large social media platform that didn’t either rot into a wasteland of scam bots or start committing atrocities.

                Very bad people own almost everything and their solution to any rising star is to buy and ruin it.

                Hell, I don’t want to adopt a platform that’s doomed to get as bad as Youtube let alone Facebook or Twitter. You’ve got to show me some low level structure that says “Here is why it can’t fall the way the last ones did.”

                I don’t give a shit about the Bluesky stock you bought. Bluesky is doomed, don’t adopt it.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  31 minutes ago

                  Ooh clever moving of the goal post there. Show me one example of Mark Zuckerberg posting to Facebook about how awesome a literal Nazi is. Personally unblocking said Nazi , and endorsing their message . That’s the discussion buddy.

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve been using it a couple of weeks and loving it. It’s just the way Twitter used to be - fun, quality content, from the people you choose to follow.

      No algorithm trying to feed you recommendations. No paid-for blue ticks. No hate-filled bile being ignored or endorsed by those in charge. If someone’s trolling you block/report them and they’re gone, just like that.

      At the moment it’s more or less everything Twitter should be. It may or may not last, but for the moment it’s great.