• Clay_pidgin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 days ago

    He never wears pants, so it’d be easy. And yet, no thanks!

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      lol they removed my comment for rule 3. I will never “be excellent” to a dictator. God forbid I mock an autocrat, I’m sorry jannies

      • Clay_pidgin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        No head of state deserves respect ipso facto; they need to earn it. Which they rarely if ever do.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 days ago

        Considering the OP clearly violates rule 2 I wouldn’t take it personally. haha

        • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          I don’t agree that it doesn’t pertain to technology. Changes to the great firewall have a technology angle in addition to the political one.

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            What Technology based discussion can we have regarding China allowing OnlyFans in the country that does not include any aspect of the political using nothing other than what is presented in the article?

            • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              7 days ago

              You have a point. I suppose in this instance any discussion about the great firewall would verge into rule 6 territory.