- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
NGL, I’ve been waiting on this. I don’t trust Seagate, and it took a while for WD to do the 2 TB version.
NGL, I’ve been waiting on this. I don’t trust Seagate, and it took a while for WD to do the 2 TB version.
I don’t understand the point you’re making when it also says in your quote that Seagate 6TB has a 0% failure rate. The 4TB models were an outlier. Modern 10+ TB Seagates have failure rates that are comparable to the rest. HGST is a bit better than them all.
I pay attention to the Backblaze stats, and both WD and Seagate have stinkers once in a while. I just don’t get HDD fanboyism. They’re all mechanical, they all can fail. Mitigate this with RAID and 3-2-1 backups. There’s no magic perfectly reliable HDD. Always plan on them failing.
Again, this is simply the latest stats, year after year, after year Seagate drives are the least reliable compared with other brands.
From your own link:
[…]
As I said, no significant difference. Guess who is in the business of data storage and uses a shit load of Seagate drives? Backblaze.