• TheSlad
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    M-d-y is whats sounds the most natural when spoken in a casual setting. I feel like thats the only reason it got carried over to text. I definitely use m-d-y when talking, and as an american I also use it out of habit when writing, but I will agree that y-m-d is definitely best for text.

    • slampisko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      M-d-y is whats sounds the most natural when spoken in a casual setting.

      That’s just habit. In my country we both write and pronounce dates as d-m-y and it’s just as natural for us as m-d-y is for you

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      but the spoken is based on the written format. you say January 2nd because that’s how you write it. if you wrote it the other way you’d say 2nd of January. you already use this sometimes, which I only assume as a remnant from a time your calendar wasn’t standardized as m-d-y yet, in “4th of July” for example.

    • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      That’s very language dependant. I’m basque and we say things naturally. We do skip the year if it’s not relevant, but when we do say it, it comes first always.

      Urtarrilak 2.
      2025eko urtarrilak 2.

      In Spanish however it’s dd-mm-yyyy and sounds perfectly natural.

      2 de Enero.
      2 de enero de 2025

      You saying that your way sounds most natural when spoken is very pretentious because you assume that whats familiar to you is what’s most natural overall, but that’s just a generalisation of your own customs.