• theonlytruescotsman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    The problem with that law is many that qualify to deliver now, wouldn’t if they were considered employees, and a lot of homeless/near homeless deliver instead of begging.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      That argument is just a regurgitation of the propaganda that these people bought into. You can’t possibly know what would have happened because the law was voted down. I think that if those companies severely restricted the number of drivers they allowed, quality of service would decline and they would end up losing market share. In the end, there probably are somewhat fewer drivers, but those drivers are guaranteed to be making at least minimum wage plus mileage and access to health insurance.

      • theonlytruescotsman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        No, that’s my personal experience and prediction knowing how shit corporations are. Yeah, in an idealized world we’d all be w2 workers, but there also wouldn’t be homeless and there’s be easy to enter programs to make money if you are.

        But until those programs are in place you’re risking the jobs of tens of thousands of people without other options. For no reason.