In a legal filing on Friday, the Justice Department argued that the law that effectively bans TikTok doesn’t violate the First Amendment’s right to free speech.

Summary

The Justice Department urged the Supreme Court to reject Donald Trump’s request to delay a law banning TikTok or forcing its sale by Jan. 19, 2025.

TikTok’s parent, ByteDance, claims the ban violates First Amendment rights, but the DOJ argued the law targets foreign ownership, not free speech, and passes constitutional scrutiny.

Trump, despite opposing a ban publicly, asked the Court to extend the deadline to seek a political resolution.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Jan. 10, with the ban set to take effect before Trump’s inauguration.

    • thericofactor
      62·
      2 days ago

      Here you are again defending TikTok. Your last argument in another thread was I was echoing Trumps talking points. When I pointed out Trump actually doesn’t want to ban TikTok like this article highlights, I didn’t hear anything back.

      So enlighten us, what is bad about TikTok being banned?

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      32·
      2 days ago

      Is it truly so hard to believe that a service that literally crafts content to deliver to you on a person/demographic basis that is owned by a competitive state would be used to deliver narratives and ideas that erode the stability and well being of the other states?

      Romania, US elections are perfect examples of this, but the danger has been here for awhile now.

      How naive can you be? TikTok ain’t shit, it’s literally just a fucking video hosting service, you think only Xi and China can serve you an endless stream of slop, 10 seconds at a time?

      Grow up, open your eyes. Seeing a threat for what it is doesn’t mean you would literally agree with Hitler (nice logical fallacy btw)