• JohnDClay
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    So you’re just saying that one was once shot down as to why the U2 as a whole was an ineffective program?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      The fact that they have never been put into mass production is a very clear indicator that it was an ineffective program.

      • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Neither was the SR-71. Both programs had a very limited mission, which is why neither was ever produced in quantity.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          Sure both were experimental, and the experiment with U2 was to make something fly so high that it couldn’t be intercepted. Turned out that the US underestimated the quality of the AD systems Soviets developed.

          • JohnDClay
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            The purpose of the U2 was to make a plane that could never be intercepted for the rest of time? No, they saw a gap that the Soviets didn’t have protection for yet, so they exploded it. One the Soviets caught up and closed the gap, they went higher and faster with the SR71, then higher and faster with satellites. It’s always back and forth, and the U2 gave a valuable capability until a counter was developed.