• atzanteol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It will be up to the courts to interpret this and their view of the Equal Rights Amendment.”

    Fahhhhhhk.

    • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This always makes me angry. Congress passed it in 1972. It’s been around for that long. In what way does it really honestly need to be reinterpreted?

      It’s the law. Just follow it.

      I’m going to interpret thieft and speeding laws.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        It’s not a law, it’s a Constitutional amendment. So passage by Congress isn’t enough, it needs to be ratified by the states too. And it wasn’t ratified by enough states (38) at the time.

        But almost 50 years later, Virginia became the 38th state to ratify it. Are they too late? Biden just said they are not too late, but this question will probably have to go through the courts.