You’d think a hegemony with a 100-years tradition of upkeeping democracy against major non-democratic players, would have some mechanism that would prevent itself from throwing down it’s key ideology.

Is it really that the president is all that decides about the future of democracy itself? Is 53 out of 100 senate seats really enough to make country fall into authoritarian regime? Is the army really not constitutionally obliged to step in and save the day?

I’d never think that, of all places, American democracy would be the most volatile.

  • Cid Vicious
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It has impeachment. The list of reasons for impeachment are (quite possibly intentionally) vague. But it has to be done through Congress.

      • Cid Vicious
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s rather obviously flawed in light of the current situation, but that is the mechanism that exists in the constitution.

      • Cid Vicious
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Well the mechanism for preventing criminals who shit all over the constitution from getting reelected is supposed to be people not voting for him. There’s not really much a constitutional democracy can do about voters being fucking morons. Kind of an inherent flaw in the system.

        • CommissarVulpin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          How do you build a system that doesn’t depend on voters not being morons? Everything I can think of, up to and including full-on authoritarianism, has human shittiness as a glaring weak point. The founding fathers assumed that people would, for the most part, act in good faith, and it kept us going for a couple hundred years, but all that is starting to fall apart.

          • Cid Vicious
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            I am not arguing in favor of authoritarianism or against democracy, to be clear. Just saying there is an inherent risk that if you give the common people power, the common people might do something dumb with it. I’m not aware of a system that removes that risk without other considerable downsides. There are other democratic governments that have fewer structural issues than the US, but none of them prevent the whole “sometimes, voters are very dumb” thing.

        • Joeffect@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          42 minutes ago

          Well the only vast ocean we have left is space… Time to build some ships and make a new country free from all the bullshit… We can do it better this time!!!