Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a message of support Thursday for Elon Musk after the world’s richest man was accused of making a Nazi salute.

Musk “is being falsely smeared,” Netanyahu wrote on X, the social media platform owned by Musk. “Elon is a great friend of Israel. He visited Israel after the October 7 massacre… [and] has since repeatedly and forcefully supported Israel’s right to defend itself against genocidal terrorists and regimes who seek to annihilate the one and only Jewish state.”

Musk later thanked Netanyahu.

  • Quacksalber
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Netanyahu is obviously not building gas chambers to gas the jews, but he is overseeing exceptional brutality being done to a group of people, most of whom are innocent. Nazism isn’t only about jews, it’s about all minorities or other ethnicities than the own one more broadly. Apart from the jews, the Nazis also killed a lot of polish people and anyone they deemed ‘deviant’. Just because ‘Nazis killed jews’ is the only piece of information that stuck to the cultural zeitgeist doesn’t mean it’s the only thing you should focus on when determining if someone is a Nazi or not.

    • Lauchs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Nazis were also famously fascist, had no elections, had a strong security system to squash internal dissent and brooked no protest, none of which apply to Israel.

      I get the appeal of labelling things you oppose as nazis but you can’t just pick and choose what aspects fit and then apply the term nazi, it just makes us look dumb.

      When someone gets banned from a site and complains that site is run by nazis, if we’re using your standard of picking and choosing then that person is as correct as you are as the site is allowing no dissent and removing those who do. But in reality (I pray) we both look at that person and think less of their complaint because of the silliness of their comparison.

      Same thing here. Use words that are accurate, genocidal would be a fair one if you believe it but nazi, it just makes you look fucking silly.

    • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I wish I could upvote this harder. The Jewish people were subjected to horrific evils, but that wasn’t just going to stop with them.

      Society did a great job of teaching about the atrocities except to really hammer home that it was the “other” that was the target, not just that single group; they are the first, but wouldn’t be the last if the Nazis were allowed to continue.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        It didn’t just stop with them.

        Slavs, gypsies, LGBT people (I guess this one actually happened before Jews), some war prisoners, Communists, blacks, etc were targeted and holocausted too.

        • brvslvrnst@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          That’s a good callout on me! I didn’t mean to insinuate it was only that group one at a time, so thank you!

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      13 hours ago

      And yet when 10% of the population of Israel were out in the streets demanding his removal in 2023 the government did nothing to the protestors. That’s decidedly not fascistic. Israel might be horrible but they aren’t currently fascistic.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 hours ago

        They shot and killed protesters in 2024. In any case, that isn’t the deciding factor when considering if something is fascistic or not.

          • Grimy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            You can have elections and still be authoritan, if you also have a solid spoonful of political repression. (HINT: shooting protesters and closing news providers is repression)

            I mean, it’s literally an apartheid state. In what world do you live in?

            • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              True but Israel’s elections are free and fair elections. No one is currently claiming otherwise that has evidence to support that claim.

              You can hate Israel all you want but they are not an authoritarian state.

              • Grimy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                They cannot be free and fair. The very fact that it’s an apartheid state means segments of the population are not represented fairly.

                Technically, palestinians can vote but they must be “citizens of israel” and getting the title is very hard, mainly because Israel makes it difficult. Gaza and most of the west bank cannot vote in national elections.

                Any politician that isn’t Jewish faces massive discrimination and there are laws to make sure they can’t actually lead or gain power.

                • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Take a second to learn what “free and fair elections” means because you are clearly confused as to what it means.

                  Most nations do not let non-citizens vote so that’s not surprising.

                  Regardless the only people calling Israel fascist are those people who have zero clue about fascism or the Israeli government.

                  • Grimy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    There is a difference between non-citizens and a population you have kept in prison over decades.

                    During the apartheid in South Africa, the black population was systematically denied citizenship. Would you consider those fair elections?

                    But I guess any rhetoric is okay as long as it’s in defense of the great genocidal warmongering state of Israel. I’m guessing you have a connection with the nation, but rabidly defending pure evil is always a bad look, even if you were raised to do so.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            You can have elections and still be fascist. Hitler was elected too.

            • Lauchs@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Jesus lord, this is a really really inaccurate take. There was only one election, it was the one in which Hitler took power. There were no more after.

              One of the hallmarks of fascism is that it is anti-Democratic.

      • Grimy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They shot and killed protesters in 2024 you wacko, not to mention that is not the deciding factor.