• otto
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    24 hours ago

    This guy tweeted about the show he was working on when he damn well knew he wasn’t supposed to do that. He reached a legal settlement.

    This sounds like sour grapes.

    • David_Eight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’ve know Sources and Alleged Sources a long time, if they say that’s what happened then I see absolutely no reason to doubt them. Why would Sources and Alleged Sources stick their necks out and lie, what would they gain?

    • Agrivar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He also sent sexually explicit and suggestive messages to a bunch of coworkers, fostering an uncomfortable work environment. He’s just an attention whore.

      • QuantumSparkles
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        23 hours ago

        So this is addressed in the article and is a major part of the point. I don’t know if I believe what he has to say on the topic, but I think it’s worth reading, especially since it is easier for a major company to write a narrative than it is for a single creator to disprove one

      • otto
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Oh, geez. I didn’t read that far down the article. Yikes