• GrumpyDuckling
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I still don’t understand the obsession. Not everything has to be a ponzi scheme where line go up. Things can shrink, it’s ok. Not everything lasts forever. At some point you can abandon areas and let them decay.

    • darkmoon_au@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Agree so much with this perspective. I’ll never forget idly watching some financial section on the news with the newscaster, ashen faced, reporting that growth in some industry had slowed, as though someone had died.

      Then I thought about it… So wait, it’s still profitable, and that profit is even still increasing, but the rate of increase is slowing!?

      People are still going to work, product is being made, profits still reaped, but the greedy ambitions of those at the top aren’t being completely fulfilled!??

      Well bless my blessing heart… What a crock of shit.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        This is just like a stock crashing because the quarterly profits did not exceed the very high growth expectations more than a lot, they only exceeded a little.

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        And also, new technology is still being developed

        So it’s not even that all progress has stopped, things are still moving forwards

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      I fully agree, but also, the whole concept of a pension plan only works if the next generation pays it forwards. Meaning this generation is paying for the current retired group, and no one will pay for them.

      • GrumpyDuckling
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, the way things are now we’ll be living 3-4 generations in a household anyway.

      • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        Thats not necessarily true. Pension just needs the economy to grow and even with less people the economy can be stimulated through technology. If 1 japanese with technology can produce product equivalent of 1950s 3 Japanese than that’s growth.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not everything has to be a ponzi scheme where line go up.

      Yeah sure my personal cup of coffee is not a ponzi scheme AFAIK.

      But global capitalism? Definitely a ponzi scheme 100%. Literally destroying the planet to prop it up.

    • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Isn’t there a protection where there may not be any new Japanese births by 2050? That they’ll essentially cease to be (pure Japanese)?