Interesting read, I learned some things that git can do and its’s cool to know it’s possible, but I get the sense that „I’m just used to doing it this way” is the author’s main reason. Making most project communication private is a huge sacrifice, and if all projects did things this way then open source development would be far worse off.
I could imagine an „account-less” git forge that uses email verification to create user sessions that then allow conversation and contribution under that email address and name. You’d have to click a magic link in your email every time you wanted to create a session, but they could be long-lived and you don’t have to manage a password.
the AUR is already kind of like a git without a forge under the hood (albeit not for the usual git purpose). You authenticate with your arch account, which is also used for the forum (and maybe also the wiki)
I agree that having all the commentary in private by default is not ideal for open source. the email verification idea is interesting since it gives you the benefits of not having to create an account.
To me the article was interesting because it points out ways that git “just works” that people might not realize. Like that you can just create a bare repo and upload to that.
Interesting read, I learned some things that git can do and its’s cool to know it’s possible, but I get the sense that „I’m just used to doing it this way” is the author’s main reason. Making most project communication private is a huge sacrifice, and if all projects did things this way then open source development would be far worse off.
I could imagine an „account-less” git forge that uses email verification to create user sessions that then allow conversation and contribution under that email address and name. You’d have to click a magic link in your email every time you wanted to create a session, but they could be long-lived and you don’t have to manage a password.
the AUR is already kind of like a git without a forge under the hood (albeit not for the usual git purpose). You authenticate with your arch account, which is also used for the forum (and maybe also the wiki)
I agree that having all the commentary in private by default is not ideal for open source. the email verification idea is interesting since it gives you the benefits of not having to create an account.
To me the article was interesting because it points out ways that git “just works” that people might not realize. Like that you can just create a bare repo and upload to that.