Hello again, I’m in a situation where the one the senior devs on my team just isn’t following best practices we laid out in our internal documentation, nor the generally agreed best practices for react; his code works mind you, but as a a team working on a client piece I’m not super comfortable with something so fragile being passed to the client.

He also doesn’t like unit testing and only includes minimal smoke tests, often times he writes his components in ways that will break existing unit tests (there is a caveat that one of the components which is breaking is super fragile; he also led the creation of that one.) But then leaves me to fix it during PR approval.

It’s weird because I literally went through most of the same training in company with him on best practices and TDD, but he just seems to ignore it.

I’m not super comfortable approving his work, but its functional and I don’t want to hold up sprints,but I’m keenly aware that it could make things really messy whenbwe leave and the client begins to handle it on their own.

What are y’alls thoughts on this, is this sort of thing common?

  • @ScreaminOctopus
    link
    7311 months ago

    I don’t understand why you’d be fixing unit tests he broke during his pr. It seems like he might be bullying you? Maybe discuss with your manager.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2511 months ago

      This stuck out to me too. Why are you fixing things on their PR? If their changes broke the tests then they need to make the changes to fix them before merging

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Unless it was directly caused by some code he wrote earlier that wasn’t caught at the time, he shouldn’t even consider that

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        611 months ago

        even if it is an earlier, yet undeteced bug, whoever found it (in this case, the cowboy), should at least log it, if not open a separate PR to fix it.