Main link is a gift link which bypasses the NYT paywall for two weeks.

Archived copy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -1211 months ago

    Won’t matter when lightblub manufacturing companies all agreed upon limiting the lifespan of bulbs to increase turnover.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planned_obsolescence#Contrived_durability

    There are incandescent bulbs that still work from over 100 years ago. Modern bulbs die with less than 10 years of use. Both incandescent and LED. But this new law will, of course, increase LED bulb sales. I’m sure no politicians have increases their GE shares before this.

    • @[email protected]OPM
      link
      fedilink
      25
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This decision is about the energy efficiency of the bulbs. Incandescent bulbs turn almost all the energy they consume into infrared light and heat. LEDs turn most of the energy they use into light.

    • HobbitFoot
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 months ago

      The bulbs work for longer, but they require more power to use.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      So far i have never replaced any LED bulbs, and the oldest ones i have are 15+ years old.

      LED strips though, where a single dead led can bring down the whole strip, are absolutely a non sensical idea.

      • WalrusDragonOnABike
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        IME, LED whining gets me to replace them before they actually die. For old people who can’t hear it, they should last longer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        011 months ago

        Well I’ve replaced over 10 in like 3 years. They can get much hotter than incandescent, which can damage the internal circuitry. Perhaps personal experience isn’t the best gauge of reliability