@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months ago"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.comexternal-linkmessage-square129fedilinkarrow-up1749arrow-down166cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1683arrow-down1external-link"They need us. We don't need them:" The fall of Twitter is making the trolls and grifters desperatewww.salon.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 11 months agomessage-square129fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish3•11 months ago but that something trained on public material is privately owned. Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it? I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now? I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
minus-squarePennomilinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-211 months agoI’d say that was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.
Is that really a problem? Is a create something new based on public knowledge, should I not be able to profit from it?
I learn to paint from YouTube, should I paint for free now?
I’ll admit that the scope of ChatGPT is MUCH bigger than one person painting.
I’d say that was a more controversial opinion. From a purist perspective I tend to believe that intellectual property in general is not ethical and stifles innovation.