• _haha_oh_wow_OPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Kill someone with a car? Finger wagging and maybe months of imprisonment.

    Kill someone with a bike? Life sentence!

    Totally makes sense, right? Especially if you compare how many people have been killed by cars vs. bicycles. Right?

    • nimisnimi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The means of transport as the specifying factor for a jail sentence is absurd or even idiotic. It’s like, if the killer was wearing red shorts - he is sentenced for 5 years. Green shorts - ok, it’s 2 years only.

      Or another “clever reasoning”: Killed by a driver of ICE car -> a year of imprisonment. Electric vehicle? - Hey, you still go to jail. 5 year sentence, you green-washed snowflake) Hybrid car? - 3 years. Bike - [random number of] years. Bus? Aeroplane? A scooter?! Etc.

      What the actual…fricking difference of what vehicle the careless driver was using

      • as the victim is killed/injured?! 🤦
    • JayleneSlide@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t get the downvotes. Anyone who spends a few minutes with active transportation and micromobility knows that automobile-caused fatalities are typically a slap on the wrist, if that. The dictum in active transportation is “Want to kill someone without any consequences? Use a car and make sure they are on a bike.”