• himbocat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m the audience for this. I’ve bought previous android portable standalone players and it being a phone is actually a negative.

    There are already plenty of good smartphone dacs so there’s no need to make a super high end battery chugging, chunky phone for a niche audience, when most people are just going to use Bluetooth headsets anyway and have a good experience doing so.

    Im not just carrying these things around like a phone because the types of headphones I’ve run with these devices are not the type that I would bring with me on a bus or to the store. Portability really doesn’t matter to the target audience of these.

    I pull my standalone player out when I want to sit in front of my my garden and listen to an album all the way through. Getting a call or a notification would kill that for me.

      • st3ph3n
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        How is that the case? Lossless is lossless. Not trying to be a smartass, genuinely curious here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Maybe he’s referring to that even if the source is 44.1/16-bit flac or wave (cd) the entire chain maybe isn’t. Maybe the firmware (android in this case) uses a fixed 48kHz sample rate which to me makes it sound a lot more dull. Maybe the dac in whatever is playing the flac file is objectively or subjectively worse than the one in the cd player (this matters a lot). Maybe the firmware doesn’t allow for exclusive access to the dac to whatever software is playing the flac file. A cd players is comparably simpler to program software for since it’s only made to do one thing which is to play one format at one sample rate and bit rate. That’s it.

          Lossless sources doesn’t mean a lossfree playback chain from the software to the dac.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1511 months ago

        FLAC is literally “Lossless” compression. That’s what the L stands for. If you rip data from a CD, compress it with FLAC and then uncompressed that FLAC file you would have a bit for bit exact replica of the CD.

      • electromage
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1511 months ago

        FLAC is the same or better than CD, as long as the source format is supported. I checksummed a CD, then ripped it to FLAC, and burned it back to a new CD and the hashes matched…what more do you want?