• RmDebArc_5OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Steam is, in my opinion, way better for the user (even if it may be worse for the developer).

    Epic lacks features that are important to me like reviews, the ability to view your library in a browser, warnings about DRM, Linux support, a hole bunch of features to discover games, a workshop, big picture mode.

    Additionally, in my experience at least, their official launcher under Windows is a buggy mess compared to steam.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      EGS has reviews as far as I can tell. I still think Steam is better, but this is a welcome move out of them. Competition is a good thing

      Edit: downvoted for pointing out that EGS has reviews. Y’all are weird lol

      • RmDebArc_5OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I was talking about written reviews, not just a like/dislike (star) system

      • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        The way Epics reviews work are awful, though. They are trying to be really attractive to developers but they aren’t attractive enough to USERS.

        For example, you have to be INVITED to review games on Epic. The system is automated and will occasionally ask for a review after you close a game, assuming you’ve been playing long enough. They claim it’s to avoid things like “review bombing”, but that’s a cop-out to shield bad developers/publishers from the repercussions of their actions (like when Denuvo was non-consensually added to Ghostwire Tokyo a year after release).