• DarkGamer
    link
    fedilink
    7611 months ago

    Let’s be real, Overwatch 2 was an update patch that they tried to sell as a sequel.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2411 months ago

      An update implies they changed something to the game. This was just an update to the monetization. A blatant pure cash grab sold as a sequel game. Its a travesty, and if they had any decency they’d scrap it, apologize, and release “Overwatch 2 A Realm Reborn” that is an actual legitimate sequel to the original game.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 months ago

      Lol when I first updated it the game didn’t replace my desktop icon so it was still saying overwatch 1 so yes just stupid patch that ruined a perfectly good game haven’t returned since

    • VanillaGorilla
      link
      fedilink
      -711 months ago

      I loved Assassin’s Creed 2, so I didn’t bat an eye buying Brotherhood and Revelations as they had the same basic background. They were full price games and I played for about 15 to 20 hours on each. That’s not much for full price. They were basically just new story lines for the main game.

        • VanillaGorilla
          link
          fedilink
          -511 months ago

          Sure, and I did. Multiple times. It’s just that the tower spin offs are too expensive. AC2 was about double the gaming for the same price.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Personally, I sometimes like when a game feels like just a new storyline (and map) for the same game. Sometimes I just want more of a good thing and don’t want to have to learn new mechanics or risk the game making things worse.

        And since dev time is limited, I think in theory, this could mean more time could be spent on making the story missions perfect. But in practice, I don’t think that usually happens. Publishers would rather cheap out.