Went to a restaurant in LA today and when I got the check I noticed that it was a bit higher than it should be. Then I noticed this 18% service charge. So… We, as customers, need to help pay for their servers instead of the owners paying their servers a living wage. And on top of that they have suggested tip. I called bs on this. I will bet you that the servers do not see a dime of this 18% service charge. [deleted a word so it wasn’t a grammatical horror to read]

  • @ebenixo
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 months ago

      Its a bit of bullshittery (again, assuming all that money goes to the staff here), but ultimately its the same thing as raising the menu prices 18%. My hunch is that people would scoff at the prices if they listed them on the menu and wouldnt go there, so they do this as a way to offset that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Yeah, people would be less likely to order food there if they knew that everything on the menu is more expensive than advertised, imagine that! It’s almost like people don’t being swindled under obviously false pretenses!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          I just mean to say that what people SAY they want, at least online, (better pay/benefits for employees, no more tipping) is at odds with what they actually expect and will tolerate to see on the menu. This is done in a very shitty, maybe even illegal way, but it does draw the direct line from the higher cost of the food to the higher pay for the staff.

          They also have the tip option which adds an even further layer of BS to it.

          Im not supporting this in any way but it is a way to break it down for customers to show them without tips this is how much extra it would be.