• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2411 months ago

      It’s fun to say this, but at least BM is really able to do their main job and preserve the artifacts.

      There’s dozens of cases where the original sites have been looted or destroyed by the origin country’s own leaders.

      Storing the artifacts outside of the influence of an area’s internal issues is actually really wise. The BM’s real wrongdoing is not paying anything for the artifacts they’ve took. I argue they’ve done enough good to offset that a little. They’re bad but not the worst.

      • DessertStorms
        link
        fedilink
        21
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s a lot of words to make the exact same excuses used not only to steal the art in the first place, but to colonise the countries it came from too - that us “civilised” people need to take care of their things because they are too “savage” to do it themselves.

        Spoken like a true coloniser.

      • Throwaway
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        They actually paid for a lot of the artifacts. A lot of arguments come from people who don’t realize stolen is hyperbole.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1511 months ago

      British Museum gets a lot of hate but there are plenty of museums that’s have walked off with others countries treasure. The Pergamon museum in Berlin took literal chunks of ancient cities

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        Germany is returning stolen artifacts, and even getting criticism for it when it backfires like it happened with the Benin Bronzes (which the Nigerian government gave to the former royal family and are not available to the general public in any country now).

        • IWantToFuckSpez
          link
          fedilink
          -511 months ago

          But the Benin Bronzes were stolen from the royal palace. They weren’t available for the general public before they were stolen. It’s up to the royal family if they should be put up for display since it is their property.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1511 months ago

            Royalty is an illegitimate concept. Any property they have is an act of theft as well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        How about we make them all give it back or make reforms to show them in host countries while the origin country retains ancestral ownership? Kinda like loaning art out.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Does that extend to all the artifacts they purchased? If I buy a painting from an artist, and years later their grandchild demands it back saying it’s a family heirloom, am I under any obligation to return it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        True. I’d never be one to argue that BM should get less hate, but I’d also never be one to argue that you shouldn’t ALSO hate on others for doing the same thing…

    • kitonthenet
      link
      fedilink
      1111 months ago

      British museum is truly terrible, but tbh the only reason people know about it and know to tag on it is because they try to reckon with their existence. Just over the channel in France is Musée du Quai Branly, which was originally going to be called “museum of the primitive arts”, that first of all costs money (BM is free) but also does a terrible job of explaining what the items are and who stole them from whom. BM tries to contextualiza what they stole and when and from whom, Quai Branly is a straight up colonial museum (there are other worse museums in Europe)