TL;DR- Be optimistic, but not fatalistic. Success still requires action. The article is worth reading in full, though.

Even if we accept the argument that the success of bitcoin as an asset due to its fixed supply and network effect is of high certainty, that does not guarantee the success of Bitcoin as a platform for a “full stack,” peer-to-peer financial ecosystem.

Failing to correct for this will result in the wider Bitcoin ecosystem suffering from choke points and resilience shortcomings which can and will be easily leveraged by adversarial actors to attack the network and its participants.

However, some will argue that ossification sooner rather than later is actually desirable as a defense against malicious changes to the Bitcoin core protocol, a la SegWit2x. This attitude entirely ignores and greatly increases another exploitable attack vector: stalling and preventing beneficial changes to the protocol which can enable more robust peer-to-peer and self-custodial solutions on subsequent layers. Indeed, after the spectacular failure of SegWit2x, any adversary would likely conclude the stalling strategy to be far more viable.

EDIT: Didn’t propagate because lemmy.world was down

  • @johnny
    link
    21 year ago

    I am confused by the motovations behinds these comments. Is OP preaching s BCH storyline, or perhaps is OP someother altcoin proponent? These comments about Segw2x seem rather dated, especially in light of the bitcoin community adopting other significant protocol changes, e.g., TapRoot.

    • cachesonOP
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Did you read the article?

      Is OP preaching s BCH storyline, or perhaps is OP someother altcoin proponent?

      Absolutely not.

      • @johnny
        link
        11 year ago

        I missed the link to the article. Thank you for pointing this out.

        • cachesonOP
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Sure thing. I was a bit miffed to be mistaken for an “altcoin proponent”, but I get it. 😅