We're allowing non-IRL loli/shota - Lemmy NSFW
lemmynsfw.com
When I opened this site 5 days ago, I could not have guessed that I would post such a post. But here we are. As you know, we did a poll on this topic here [https://lemmynsfw.com/post/26029]. Around 40% of people said to block, the rest said to not to. In such cases, we wanted to make the poll, even though it doesn’t matter. Right now, I’m still currently agreeing with @bobbiguy2122 [https://lemmynsfw.com/u/bobbiguy2122] here [https://lemmynsfw.com/comment/82152]. We are going to let community moderators handle the situation in within limits. So it’s going to be users choice to subscribe to that community or creating new one with his own rules. #### Why not completely block it If we are going to split, there is so many fractions as well. As someone who only likes women and plain porn, I don’t want to ban tentacle, futanari or gay stuff. Because even though they are kinky, they are also a pleasure. Being attracted to petite teens is just like these pleasures, and the vast majority actually like it. I think we should not ban this pleasure just because it is in a dangerous area. #### As a result First of all we will explicitly ban IRL loli images. Although we will allow non-IRL content under moderator control, tho we will control childish content independently of moderators too. We will make this distinction according to images that look and act like children. #### Defederation I see a lot of people are worried about this situation. But I don’t care. Because as you can see, beehaw, one of the largest instances, blocked the other 2 largest instances. This situation is inevitable in NSFW only instances like us. As a result, you must have one main account, where you can access all instances, and one NSFW account, where you can only access NSFW content. For example, I don’t plan to block any instances on this instance, except in extreme cases.

SEE SECOND EDIT DOWN BELOW

Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.

Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the “Loli” announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.

Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?

There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?

edit: UPDATE

Take this update as you will

I’m taking it as a backtrack, but it’s still not an instance I want to associate with.

Lots of people keen to offer their opinion of drawn picture of naked kids, haven’t seen any alternatives though

Edit 2: At this point I think their updated rules are good. It took a bit to get there, but in the end they appear to be taking a hard stance. Hopefully this is enforced.

I dont think it was a case of “whoops bad English” like they are suggesting, I think it was a total 180 backflip. This doesnt really instill confidence in the admins IMO, but im happy that they have made the right decision in regards to allowed content. Hopefully this is was just some early wobblies and the community can move on.

  • Hanabie
    6·
    2 years ago

    You’re surprised that the internet is full of porn?

    • Otome-chan@kbin.social
      72·
      2 years ago

      it’s kinda funny the people most up in arms about loli/shota stuff are also the ones telling people to not “kinkshame”.

      • Killakomodo@kbin.social
        7·
        2 years ago

        OMFG this is why I hate the “you can’t kink shame bullshit” I have no fucking problem shaming pedos, necros and rapist, they deserve the utmost shame for the trash they are.

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          42·
          2 years ago

          1. loli/shota has nothing to do with pedos

          2. necro for fictional content is harmless, and rape is the most common kink among women; cnc is a thing.

          but thanks for proving my point. no one is defending pedos here.

          • Killakomodo@kbin.social
            4·
            2 years ago

            Yes, it does have to do with pedos, you are just unwilling to admit you are a pedo.

            also I am not proving your point, obviously I am just fine with “kink shaming” that is the reason you are mad at me right now.

            • Otome-chan@kbin.social
              22·
              2 years ago

              I’m not even into loli stuff so lol. if I date a man is he a pedo? is that how you think?

              • Killakomodo@kbin.social
                3·
                2 years ago

                are you over 18? and is the man over 18? then that’s fine, no shit?

                are we just asking dumb questions now?

                  • Killakomodo@kbin.social
                    1·
                    2 years ago

                    Because those two things are incongruent and you know it, you just choose to ignore it. there is no such thing as an 18+ loli, and don’t bother telling me there is because no there is not.

        • Otome-chan@kbin.social
          22·
          2 years ago

          see this is why weebs do not take anti-loli people seriously. you accuse me of being a pedophile simply because I’m speaking the facts.

          I honestly have no intent on using kbin for nsfw, and the sort of content discussed isn’t my preference anyway. The nsfw content I look at involve 30 year old anime characters who are not loli/shota lol. you’re barking up the wrong tree with your moralizing.

          • gmtom@kbin.social
            5·
            2 years ago

            Stop talking about weebs like we’re all nonce that agree with you. Plenty of us are against child porn and are fully aware that loli explicitly refers to kids, as that is LITERALLY the fucking definition of the word and even in Japan lolicon is synonymous with pedo.

            Stop going to bat to defend pedophiles