That’s strawman #2 you’re busting out. You clearly can’t deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald’s and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can’t have that.
I didn’t say anyone was obligated to agree with me.
I didn’t say my outlook was correct. I don’t think objective morality exists so I wouldn’t say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple.
I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous?
Again, I don’t have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it’s obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me.
I have never apologized for rapists.
Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions?
I’m afraid of all rape victims? Lol you’re really good at this jumping to conclusions thing. I’m happy to watch you tire yourself out though.
That’s strawman #2 you’re busting out. You clearly can’t deal with the fact that not everyone will bow down to you the second you oppose rape victims prioritizing their own lives above the demands of an evil society that is designed to serve their rapists and subjugate them. It would threaten your ability to keep going to McDonald’s and 7-11 because you know allowing rape victims to protect themselves, especially after the fact, would break the status quo your privileged ass benefits from, and we can’t have that.
You have a LOT of privilege to check.
Was this generated by some sort of schizo sjw AI or something? You are increasingly incoherent.
You did better when you came brigading with your alt I just blocked. Think before speaking.
Have you considered that multiple people can disagree with you? I don’t have any alts LOL. Proving my point.
Have you considered other people are not obligated to adopt your point of view or way of thinking?
Have you considered your moral outlook is not the only correct one?
Have you considered your outlook is, in fact, harmful and dangerous for innocent people?
Have you considered other people noticed you trying to upvote yourself with an alt, earlier? Do you think we can’t count?
But what can we expect from a rape apologist who knows he is wrong?
I didn’t say anyone was obligated to agree with me.
I didn’t say my outlook was correct. I don’t think objective morality exists so I wouldn’t say any outlook is the correct one. But if it did exist then there would be one correct morality rather than multiple.
I am trying to consider this but you refused to answer my question earlier. How is not killing someone harmful and dangerous?
Again, I don’t have any alts. If you rub your brain cells together, it’s obvious that someone else could agree with me and be up voting me.
I have never apologized for rapists.
Are you starting to see what I mean about jumping to conclusions?