A key witness against former President Donald Trump and his two co-defendants in the Mar-a-Lago documents case recanted previous false testimony and provided new information implicating the defendants after he switched lawyers, special counsel Jack Smith’s office said in a new court filing.

Yuscil Taveras, the director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago, Trump’s club in Palm Beach, Florida, changed his testimony last month about efforts to delete security camera video at the club after he changed from a lawyer paid for by Trump’s Save America PAC to a public defender, Tuesday’s filing says.

  • @hoshikarakitaridia
    link
    1310 months ago

    Idk but possibly related: I’ve heard that there are a good number of times you should prefer public defender to paid representation.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        3710 months ago

        Not OP and not too sure myself, but one instance I could think of is if you’re a defendant in a high-profile political crime case, but you yourself are not a politician and have no stakes in the outcome for the other defendents so a superpac that does have that interest hires you a lawyer who convinces you to give a false testimony in order to protect said other defendent in leiu of your own best interests.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2410 months ago

          That’s called a conflict of interest and possibly suborning perjury. That’s the kind of thing that would get you disbarred, if the Bar actually cared about such things.

          Make Attorneys Get Attorneys

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            210 months ago

            Pretty sure Trump has scared off any lawyers who are not terribly crooked at this point. He’s got kind of a history of throwing any halfway honest ones under the bus or not listening to their recommendations. He sounds like a nightmare client.

      • @hoshikarakitaridia
        link
        110 months ago

        The main thing I’ve heard is that public defense is offen local to the court house and therefore has a feel for tone, procedure and manner. This might give them a few sympathy points, and even though obv the case itself is far more important, this makes a few things easier still.