cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

  • Zuberi 👀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    The rental value would be $0.

    Contrary to lemmy.world logic, 0% of 0 is 0

    • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      No, the rental value is the nominal price of the rental. This is extremely simple, a child could understand this. The landlords have gotten loans based on the assumed rental income, which is not $0.

      • Zuberi 👀
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        They aren’t making any income on rent. So what % would an income tax have to be to be >0$ exactly?

        • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Seriously? OK, you must not really have thought about this before. They are listing their properties for rent but nobody is renting them. They’re listing those properties at the nominal rental value. So the tax would be on that nominal rental cost. This is like, babytown frolics level simple to connect the dots on even if you don’t agree with it - understanding this should have clicked like two replies back.

            • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2010 months ago

              nominal income

              nominal income

              nominal income

              you’re welcome to disagree but wasting this much time pretending to not understand is just childish, have a very nice day weirdo

              • Zuberi 👀
                link
                fedilink
                English
                7
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                It’s taxed upon selling, for the value of the house, which would tax exactly what you’re talking about.

                Trying to act like I’m not understanding makes you sound “childish” my dude. Grow tf up and READ. INCOME TAX ON ZERO DOLLARS IS ZERO DOLLARS

                Edit: This dude’s banner is a 9/11 photo. Nice… I’m arguing with a literal troglodyte over the semantics of a dumb article title.

                • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1910 months ago

                  Edit: This dude’s banner is a 9/11 photo. Nice… I’m arguing with a literal troglodyte over the semantics of a dumb article title.

                  michael-laugh

                • nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1010 months ago

                  amazing, now you understand and it’s almost like I didn’t have to waste any time explaining this stupid concept to you

                  thanks, good job, very useful

                  • Zuberi 👀
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    810 months ago

                    You are 100% part of the problem for hexbear’s negative view from outsiders.

                    Tax the rich’s 0$ monthly rents! That’ll show um.