• ThrowawayPermanente
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The alternative is that they will never have any job at all, and they might not be happy living on handouts.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The alternative is they get paid just as much as everyone else, receive some extra cash from the government because being disabled can carry big hidden costs most people don’t realize.

      The insensitive for the business is a tax break so the disabled worker does cost them less overall, they NEED this extra bit of what otherwise would be tax money to make reasonable changes to integrate the peoples special needs. After which its easier to hire more disabled people meaning more tax breaks.

      Gonna take a personal stance that if 80% of your workers are officially disabled you shouldn’t need to pay tax at all. Helping these people is enough contributing to society to be ethical.

      This isn’t a perfect system but its similar to how many countries do it and its miles better then forcing them into wageslavery.

      Paying the disabled worker less is a complete upside down work because they have to work so much harder to get the same result. Remember your wage isn’t just a reflection of your output, otherwise it wouldn’t be an hourly rate. Its a reflection of the time and energy your body is putting into it every day.