• Munisk
    link
    fedilink
    310 months ago

    This is a bit of a tricky example, if Orban or Meloni said that I’d be suspicious.

    But if an environmentalist or leftist criticised bankers for investment in fossil fuel or the 2007 economic collapse then it’s obviously not dog whistle to blame it in international bankers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      Yeah, obviously context matters, if someone uses it once or twice when complaining about capitalism or economic issues, it’s probably not meant as a dog whistle.

      The phrasing of “international bankers” is kinda weird, like the international part isn’t really relevant, and it’s not really something someone would come up with in most scenarios. I think most people would come up with something more closely related to what they’re criticizing.

      I’d assume coming from a leftist it’s probably just them hearing it somewhere and not knowing the origin and common usage. I’d definitely be watching for any other signs of antisemitism though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      010 months ago

      I believe this happened in the UK. I’m not totally familiar with their politicians, but I believe it was Corbin? that was standing in front of a mural that was supposed to be about some “illuminati” intentional banker conspiracy and he got a whole bunch of shit for being antisemitic because the bankers were Jewish, when their religion/ethnicity had absolutely nothing to do with the criticism.